<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking about platforms for open learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.k12opened.com/blog/archives/228/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.k12opened.com/blog/archives/228</link>
	<description>A blog for reflecting on the opportunities and challenges in open education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:39:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.k12opened.com/blog/archives/228/comment-page-1#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.k12opened.com/blog/?p=228#comment-736</guid>
		<description>Hi, Michael. (I do remember you from the MozOpenEd course.)  Your project description and links were useful to me. Thanks for sharing.

While I love wikis for a great many things, I don&#039;t think this would be the most useful tool for my project. For development, we won&#039;t be using a mass collaboration process, need more structure, and will have a lot of multimedia. For actual delivery, I&#039;ve struggled with the difficulty of doing much that is interactive with MediaWiki.

The import/export functionality of whatever we use would give end consumers the option of putting it in a wiki if they chose though, which I think is important.

While I agree that any LMS imposes structure on end users, our target audience (public school K-12 teachers) are generally not able/willing to spend a lot of time on massaging content. One thing I like a lot about Moodle is that it is very easy for an individual teacher to move things around, add content or resources, take things out, etc. 

Also, a lot of schools here already use Moodle. Not having a steep learning curve and supplying vetted content for a tool they already use will be a huge benefit to widescale adoption.

Now, to figure out the logistics of the import/export routine. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Michael. (I do remember you from the MozOpenEd course.)  Your project description and links were useful to me. Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>While I love wikis for a great many things, I don&#8217;t think this would be the most useful tool for my project. For development, we won&#8217;t be using a mass collaboration process, need more structure, and will have a lot of multimedia. For actual delivery, I&#8217;ve struggled with the difficulty of doing much that is interactive with MediaWiki.</p>
<p>The import/export functionality of whatever we use would give end consumers the option of putting it in a wiki if they chose though, which I think is important.</p>
<p>While I agree that any LMS imposes structure on end users, our target audience (public school K-12 teachers) are generally not able/willing to spend a lot of time on massaging content. One thing I like a lot about Moodle is that it is very easy for an individual teacher to move things around, add content or resources, take things out, etc. </p>
<p>Also, a lot of schools here already use Moodle. Not having a steep learning curve and supplying vetted content for a tool they already use will be a huge benefit to widescale adoption.</p>
<p>Now, to figure out the logistics of the import/export routine. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rowe</title>
		<link>http://www.k12opened.com/blog/archives/228/comment-page-1#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.k12opened.com/blog/?p=228#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Hi Karen.  I came across this post through the Open Education News feed and it sounds quite similar to what I&#039;m trying to do with an open physiotherapy textbook...my project from the MozOpenEd course earlier this year (I think we might have chatted briefly then?).  The details of my project are at http://www.mrowe.co.za/doku.php/open_physiotherapy_textbook, where I link to a few platforms I&#039;ve looked at.

I&#039;m thinking of a wiki for collaborative authoring of content, with the addition of an extension that would allow exporting of sections of content in a variety of formats, including print (most students in South Africa would have very limited access to the internet).  Mediawiki combined with Pediapress seems like it might be useful.

I like your idea of using one system to manage content and then being able to export / import that content into another platform.  My only issue with that approach though, is that I disagree with using Learning Management Systems in general.  I think that more often than not, they lock users (teachers and students) into a structured system that isn&#039;t flexible enough.  But that&#039;s just a personal opinion based more on how LMS&#039; are actually used, as opposed to how they could be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karen.  I came across this post through the Open Education News feed and it sounds quite similar to what I&#8217;m trying to do with an open physiotherapy textbook&#8230;my project from the MozOpenEd course earlier this year (I think we might have chatted briefly then?).  The details of my project are at <a href="http://www.mrowe.co.za/doku.php/open_physiotherapy_textbook" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrowe.co.za/doku.php/open_physiotherapy_textbook</a>, where I link to a few platforms I&#8217;ve looked at.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking of a wiki for collaborative authoring of content, with the addition of an extension that would allow exporting of sections of content in a variety of formats, including print (most students in South Africa would have very limited access to the internet).  Mediawiki combined with Pediapress seems like it might be useful.</p>
<p>I like your idea of using one system to manage content and then being able to export / import that content into another platform.  My only issue with that approach though, is that I disagree with using Learning Management Systems in general.  I think that more often than not, they lock users (teachers and students) into a structured system that isn&#8217;t flexible enough.  But that&#8217;s just a personal opinion based more on how LMS&#8217; are actually used, as opposed to how they could be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choosing an Open Platform for Open Textbooks &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.k12opened.com/blog/archives/228/comment-page-1#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Choosing an Open Platform for Open Textbooks &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.k12opened.com/blog/?p=228#comment-733</guid>
		<description>[...] 7, 2009 &#183; Leave a Comment  Karen Fasimpaur has a new post asking which open platform would be best for open textbooks. From the post:  While [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7, 2009 &middot; Leave a Comment  Karen Fasimpaur has a new post asking which open platform would be best for open textbooks. From the post:  While [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
